A new survey of 3,000 Americans aged 18 to 28 puts a number on a behavior everyone has watched play out in the group chat: 77% say soft hermitting — deliberately turning down plans to stay home — sounds like them, according to the full PapersOwl report. Just 9% reject the description outright.
The headline for the soft hermit is less about withdrawal than arithmetic. The young adults opting out are not flaking on their friends so much as budgeting their social lives: the reasons they give most often are the cost of going out and the energy it takes, not a mental-health crisis. "People are not withdrawing from social life, they are budgeting it," said Jamie Thompson, PapersOwl's director of cultural and behavioral insights, as reported by The News Headliner. "The economics are doing most of the work."
Soft Hermitting Is Now the Default
At the center of soft hermitting is not avoidance but preference. When respondents were asked why they stay in, depletion came first: 55% said socializing drains them, and half said they genuinely like being home. Behind preference sit the harder constraints: 42% say going out simply costs more than they can justify, and roughly a third are burned out from work or school.
The same behavior then splits along two different explanations. Roughly half of the men who soft-hermit say going out costs too much, compared with just under a third of the women. The pattern flips on energy: about three in five women say socializing drains them, versus half of men. Two in five women say soft hermitting sounds a lot like them, compared with fewer than a third of men — men more often park themselves in the softer "from time to time" answer.
JOMO Has Beaten FOMO by Two to One
Half of respondents say they feel fine or good about missing out, compared with 27% who feel anxious or disappointed — close to a two-to-one split in favor of staying home. The joy of missing out is now the common position; the fear of it is the minority one. This is the emotional weather of soft hermitting: relief, not regret.
Asked why missing out feels good, the answers were about money and bandwidth. Among those who enjoy missing out, 61% say it saves money and 60% say it buys back time and energy. Only 29% frame it as a mental-health decision. In the respondents' own words, JOMO — the emotional engine of soft hermitting — is less a wellness philosophy than a budgeting strategy that happens to feel good.
The sharpest reversal sits inside that question. Men are twice as likely as women to give the mental-health answer: 38% versus 18%. The stereotype says women medicalize their social lives while men shrug; on this specific question, the study's own data runs the other way. As Thompson told the press, the framing split is real, but anyone treating it as a clean rule will get it wrong.
The Summer Crash-Out, by the Numbers
More than half of respondents — 54% — say they hit an emotional breaking point over the summer just past, and more than a quarter say it happened more than once. Soft hermitting, it turns out, has a season: add in those who came close, and roughly seven in ten felt summer tip from fun into too much.
Money was the number one cause, named by 58%. Heat and bad sleep followed at 46%. Comparison pressure — a summer that did not look like everyone else's — came in at 43%. When the researchers asked what tipped people over the edge, the bill beat the weather.
The bill-first pattern is not new. According to a 2026 Deloitte survey of young workers, cost of living has topped the concern list for a fifth straight year, with more than half of Gen Z respondents saying they have delayed major life decisions for financial reasons. It is the same pressure behind housing costs pushing young adults to skip meals to make rent — the social calendar is just the next line item on the budget.
Not Antisocial — Rationed
About half of respondents regularly or sometimes carry an analog bag — a book, journal or sketchbook packed to reach for instead of a phone. The analog bag is the soft hermit's kit for idle moments. Only about one in ten says the look is the point; 41% say the goal is rebuilding their attention span. The widest gender gap in the study sits here: men describe screen-free time as attention repair far more often, while women are more likely to say it helps them feel calmer and more present.
The one trend almost nobody actually does is the one with the most headlines: fewer than one in ten use a dumb phone regularly, while nearly half have never considered one. Whatever the coverage suggests, this is not primarily an aesthetic movement — the small group that did switch says it was about being in the room they were physically in.
And the social life that survives the budget looks different. 51% actively choose low-pressure hangouts built around an activity — puzzle nights, run clubs, book clubs — and another 31% like them situationally. Only 5% would rather have the conversation-first version. All told, 82% are open to activity-based hangouts: connection with scaffolding, and nobody expected to perform conversation for three hours. This is soft hermitting with company.
Soft hermitting is not a refusal of social life; it is a renegotiation of its terms. Three constraints show up again and again: money, energy, and attention. The trend words are new; the behavior underneath is not complicated. People are protecting the resources they have left, and they have stopped apologizing for it. For more on how young adults are recalibrating everyday life, see The Feed.
PapersOwl surveyed 3,000 Americans aged 18 to 28 in August 2026, recruiting through online panels via Random Device Engagement. The study did not target specific ethnicities or social backgrounds, and percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number.
Comments 0
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Leave a comment
Share your thoughts. Your email will not be published.