Every new app promises to save time at work. According to a new study from KU Leuven, workplace tech does make workers faster — but it also piles on more work, more stress, and more complexity. Researchers surveyed more than 2,800 workers in Belgian industry and found a paradox sitting at the heart of modern productivity tools: the same workplace tech meant to lighten the load often makes it heavier, and the people who feel it most are those with the least say in how the tools get used. For younger workers, who tend to absorb new digital tools faster than anyone else, that finding is worth paying attention to.
The study was carried out by KU Leuven's Centre for Sociological Research, which invited 80,000 members of the ACV-CSC METEA trade union to take part; thousands completed the full survey across the metal and textiles industries. The research team says the design, analysis, and conclusions were entirely its own, with the union's role limited to distributing the questionnaire, as reported by myScience.
Workplace tech makes work faster, but busier
The headline result is a split verdict. Workers in the survey say workplace tech genuinely improves their work and makes them more productive — the robots, artificial intelligence systems, and digital dashboards deliver the efficiency they promise. But many of the same workers report that the technology does not make their jobs more enjoyable. Instead, they describe heavier workloads, more stress, greater complexity, and a larger number of tasks landing on their plates.
Digital applications built to support people were a particular pain point: information and communication systems — the chat apps, dashboards, and notification streams familiar to anyone in a modern workplace — regularly came with a heavier workload attached. In other words, workplace tech raises the ceiling on what a worker can produce, and then quietly raises the floor on what is expected of them. "Technology is not inherently good or bad for workers," said researcher Yennef Vereycken, according to the university's report on the findings. "The way an application is designed and implemented helps determine whether it genuinely supports the work or merely increases the pressure."
The burden is not shared equally
The study found that workplace tech lands very differently depending on who you are. Higher-educated workers, white-collar employees, and managers more often experience new tools as supportive. Lower-educated workers and manual workers more frequently report increased workloads, more stress, and greater complexity in their jobs.
The gap extends to data collection. More personal data is gathered about manual workers than about office workers, and the people tracked most know the least about it: only 30 percent of respondents said they could access their own data, and just a quarter knew what their employer does with the information it collects — yet nine in ten said they trusted their privacy was being respected. The researchers call this the privacy paradox.
"The technological transition does not have equal consequences for everyone," said Valeria Pulignano, professor of sociology at KU Leuven, according to the report. The workers who already hold a stronger position tend to get more of the benefits, while others absorb the extra workload and complexity — a divide she argues deserves as much attention as the technology itself.
Why young workers should pay attention
If you are early in your career, this pattern should sound familiar. New workplace tech usually rolls out to the youngest employees first — they are the ones handed the new platform, the new tracker, the new chat channel — and they are the least likely to have a say in the decision. The KU Leuven research backs up that instinct: around seven in ten workers said they were never or only rarely involved in planning or implementing new technology. Strikingly, the workers who were involved reported systematically lower workloads and less stress.
That finding points to a practical takeaway for anyone starting out: when new workplace tech arrives on your desk, ask how it will change your day-to-day work, what data it collects, and what training comes with it. The researchers frame the issue as democratic as much as technical — and the union that backed the study agrees. "New technology changes very concretely how workers perform their jobs," said Lieve De Preter, president of ACV-CSC METEA, according to Aktif TV. Workers and their representatives, she said, need a seat at the table from the very beginning.
There is one reassuring note in the data. Despite the anxiety around automation, the workers surveyed do not expect a wave of job losses: two in five believe new technology will reduce the number of jobs, while an equal share expect no change — or even more jobs. For readers building a career around workplace tech, the productivity question is less about being replaced and more about being overloaded. A related look at the wider attention crisis is worth a read: The Workplace Focus Crisis: Output Is Up but Attention Is Down.
Comments 0
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Leave a comment
Share your thoughts. Your email will not be published.