Why Social Media Democracy Feels Broken Everywhere Now

Some 64% of American adults now say social media is harming their democracy, according to Pew Research Center's latest multi-country survey — and while that number has not budged since 2022, attitudes almost everywhere else have turned sharply darker. The old promise of social media democracy, that everyone gets a megaphone and the best ideas win, has curdled into a global recognition of something plainer: the town square moved into an algorithmic feed, and the feed is not neutral.

The survey, based on more than 45,000 interviews conducted between February and May 2026, is a snapshot of a mood rather than a verdict on any single platform. But as a mood it is striking. As reported by Reuters, a growing share of people believe social media manipulates and divides people, even as a majority still concedes that the platforms inform citizens and give them a voice in politics. That tension — useful megaphone, toxic town square — is the whole story of the internet right now.

Everyone else is catching up with the American gloom

Four years ago the United States stood alone in its pessimism, a full ten percentage points darker than the next-most negative country. Today the Netherlands has passed it: seven in ten Dutch adults now call social media a bad thing for their democracy, up from just over half in 2022. French and German views have closed in on the American level, negative assessments have climbed notably in the United Kingdom and Canada, and the Pew researchers write that, as they put it, "people in other countries are catching up with Americans' grim take on the effects of social media."

The four-year slide is remarkably consistent. In Germany the negative share climbed from about two in five to roughly three in five; in Japan it nearly doubled, from under a quarter to more than two in five; and Hungary and Poland each jumped twenty points. Across the 26 countries with comparable trend data, the share calling social media bad for democracy rose in sixteen of them. And it is the richest countries doing most of the frowning: the nations where half or more say the platforms are bad for democracy are among the wealthiest surveyed, while in places like Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria, majorities still see the platforms as a good thing for democratic life. Global faith in social media democracy is crumbling fastest exactly where exposure to the algorithmic era runs deepest.

The megaphone still works — that is the uncomfortable part

Here is the counterpoint the doomsayers keep missing: across the countries polled, the median verdict is still net positive — more adults say social media has been good for democracy than say it has been bad. Roughly three in five say the internet and online platforms have expanded people's ability to have a meaningful voice in politics, and more than three in four say they have made people better informed about current events. Young adults are the least gloomy about social media democracy of all: in Britain, three in five adults under 35 say the platforms have been good for democracy, compared with under a third of those over 50, and a similar age gap shows up in the United States. Dismiss the platforms entirely and you are dismissing the most democratic thing about them.

For anyone under 35, this is not abstract — the feed is where news breaks, campaigns are announced and protests organize; it is the civic environment itself. Which is why the finding that matters most is the paired one: the same public that credits the platforms with giving it a voice also believes, by wide margins, that they have made it easier to manipulate people with false information and made people more divided in their political opinions. Nearly four in five said manipulation is easier now; more than two in three said division is worse. You can love the megaphone and still fear what the feed does to the crowd.

Blaming users misses the point

The sharpest reading of these numbers is not that humanity got worse; it is that engagement-driven feeds reward outrage, and ordinary users have noticed. That is why governments are moving: Australia has already banned social media for under-16s — a move backed by more than four in five Australian adults — and is now weighing rules to let users opt out of algorithmically recommended feeds, as Reuters reported. The big platforms, meanwhile, have faced thousands of lawsuits over harms to users and paid out large settlements.

None of this means the internet was a mistake, and nostalgia for the old gatekeepers is its own kind of fantasy. But the town square analogy finally deserves to die: a square has no engagement team. When nearly two-thirds of a country tells pollsters the thing is hurting their democracy — and the rest of the planet starts nodding along — the honest response is not to log off and preach, but to admit the business model is the message. Fix the incentives, and the mood might follow.

More commentary in this vein lives on the site's hot takes desk, and the latest reporting across every beat is at the GenZ NewZ homepage.