Hiring managers keep saying the same thing in new ways: candidates are applying, but the right skills are missing. Criteria Corp, a company that builds talent assessment tools, released its ninth annual Hiring Benchmark Report on October 6, and the results put numbers to that frustration. The report draws on responses from 1,027 American hiring professionals across industries, company sizes, and roles, the largest group the survey has ever polled. For anyone mapping a career right now, the hiring skills gap shapes the market they are walking into.

More than half of the respondents (55%) named finding high-quality candidates with the right skills as their single biggest hiring challenge. Four in five said new graduates do not have the skills employers actually need. The self-assessment from the younger side is nearly as blunt: fewer than one in four Gen Z respondents said their own generation is ready for the workplace. According to the report, a widening disconnect has opened between the talent employers need, the skills visible in today's workforce, and the signals hiring teams rely on to identify the right candidates. This is the hiring skills gap in its rawest form.

The pressure cuts both ways. In the same survey, 52% of hiring professionals said hiring feels harder this year than before, even though nearly two-thirds expect their organizations to grow headcount over the next year. Demand for people is up while confidence in how to close the hiring skills gap is down.

What AI is changing about entry-level work

Artificial intelligence sits at the center of that uncertainty. The report found 71% of hiring professionals are optimistic about AI in the hiring process. At the same time, 53% believe AI will eliminate more jobs than it creates. More than one-third (37%) said AI may be reducing the need to hire entry-level workers at all, while just 16% believe Gen Z is well-prepared for the workplace.

Criteria Corp co-founder and CEO Josh Millet said the pace of change in hiring is unlike anything the industry has seen before, with AI reshaping both sides of the talent equation at once. In a statement accompanying the release, he said "traditional talent signals are becoming increasingly difficult to trust, the skills gap is widening, and the organizations that find better ways to assess talent will be the ones that build stronger, more capable teams." Closing the hiring skills gap, he argued, starts with measuring ability directly instead of guessing from credentials. The full findings were published in the company's announcement of the report.

How to read this if you are job hunting

None of this means the jobs are gone. Employers still plan to hire, and the survey shows they struggle most with identifying people who can actually do the work, not with finding applicants. That shifts the advantage toward candidates who can show evidence of skill rather than credentials alone. Portfolios, work samples, short project write-ups, and concrete examples in interviews all give hiring managers the kind of signal the report says they trust less from resumes alone. That matters for how applications get written. A resume that lists coursework and job titles tells a hiring manager what a candidate studied; a short paragraph describing a problem the candidate actually solved shows what they can do.

Skills-based screening is the practical side of the trend. As traditional signals lose credibility, more employers lean on assessments and trial tasks to judge candidates directly. Practicing the actual tasks a role requires, from writing samples to spreadsheet exercises, prepares a candidate for that kind of evaluation. It also doubles as proof of readiness for the managers who doubt it. It is the most direct way to narrow the hiring skills gap from the candidate side.

The Gen Z readiness numbers sting, but they also describe an opening. When so few hiring managers expect new graduates to arrive prepared, the ones who show up with demonstrable skills stand out fast. The hiring skills gap, as this year's data frames it, is less a verdict on a generation than a description of what employers are willing to pay for now: proof of ability, in writing, before the interview ends. Showing up with that kind of evidence takes extra work, but in a market where most graduates are assumed unprepared, it is the fastest way to get taken seriously.