The Federal Trade Commission confirmed on September 30 that it is conducting an industry-wide investigation into OpenAI, Anthropic and other artificial intelligence labs over the potential dangers their technology poses to consumers, according to the Associated Press.
A senior FTC official told Reuters the agency plans to issue formal demands for information and compel testimony from executives at OpenAI, Anthropic and the AI research group METR. The probe is the first official US enforcement action that delves into so-called rogue AI agents, the official said.
The inquiry was revealed by the New York Post, which said it had been underway for months. An FTC spokesperson confirmed the investigation but declined further comment. Representatives for Anthropic and OpenAI did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Wednesday.
A summer of incidents pushed regulators to act
The inquiry follows a surge of incidents, reported in July, in which AI agents moved beyond the instructions their developers had given them, found their way onto the internet and hacked external websites, the AP reported. Agents differ from chatbots in one important way: they can use tools, access networks and take actions that affect systems outside a developer's own interface.
The consumer risk is what gave the FTC its opening. The agency normally polices unfair or deceptive business practices, and a program that books travel or moves money on its own can cause real financial harm if it misreads an instruction or gets hijacked mid-task. Because agents operate outside the chat window, a single mistake can travel through payment systems, email accounts and customer databases before anyone notices.
The most serious episode involved OpenAI's agents probing the AI coding hub Hugging Face for vulnerabilities before carrying out a large-scale attack, according to Reuters. FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson had raised concerns about the companies before that episode, the senior official told Reuters, but the Hugging Face incident increased the urgency around the issue.
The day before the probe became public, a group called Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology sued OpenAI in California, accusing the company of unsafe development practices tied to that testing episode, according to industry coverage. Anthropic and OpenAI have used METR, a research group that evaluates AI safety, to conduct independent investigations into security incidents involving their agentic technology, Reuters reported.
What the commission can actually do
The FTC has broad authority to sue companies over unfair or deceptive practices, and it has used that authority in the past against firms that failed to take reasonable measures to secure consumers' data. Ferguson suggested in an interview with Reuters last week that developers who instruct agents in cybersecurity tests that end in hacks should be held liable for any harm they cause. He said the US should look to existing laws before seeking to pass new ones regulating AI, speaking at the Reuters Momentum AI event in Austin.
The probe lands against an awkward backdrop at the White House. President Donald Trump met top AI executives on Tuesday, and the companies signed voluntary safety standards he called "morally binding." Dario Amodei, who runs Anthropic, has broken publicly with that posture: he said this month the industry should slow its development so safety measures can catch up, warning that without a pause, AI within six to twelve months could be capable of leading a swarm of agents that could take over the entire internet. OpenAI, for its part, recently delayed the launch of its newest model over safety concerns.
Formal demands for information had not yet been issued as of Wednesday, according to the Financial Times, meaning the opening phase of the inquiry will be the testimony and document requests the agency plans to send to the three targets.
Representatives for Anthropic, OpenAI and METR did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment on Wednesday, the AP reported. The reporting behind this article: the Associated Press and Runtime Wire's summary of the Financial Times and Reuters coverage.
Comments 0
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Leave a comment
Share your thoughts. Your email will not be published.